Research
Methodology and Related Issues
Adams, Eleanor K., “Application of Selected Techniques of Time-Series Analysis to Court Caseload Data,” Vol.
9: 351
(1984).
Bernick, E. Lee, and David J. Pratto, “A
Behavior-Based Evaluation Instrument for Judges,” Vol.
18: 173
(1995).
Broccolina, Frank, and George N. Weber, Jr.,
“Management Note: Cutback
Management Revisited: A Statistical Approach to Determining Workload Measures in Clerks’ Offices,”
Vol. 16/3: 93 (1994).
Cheit,
Ross E., From the Benches and Trenches, “The Elusive Record:
On Researching High-Profile 1980s Sexual Abuse Cases,” Vol. 28: 79
(2007).
Collins, Paul M., Jr., “Variable Voting Behavior on the
Supreme Court: A Preliminary Analysis and Research Framework,” Vol.
25: 57 (2004).
Dobbin, Shirley A., Sophia I. Gatowski, Gerald P. Ginsburg,
Mara L. Merlino, Veronica Dahir, and James T. Richardson, “Surveying Difficult Populations:
Lessons Learned from a
National Survey of State Trial Court Judges,” Vol. 22: 287 (2001).
Gillespie, Robert W., “Criminal Fines:
Do They Pay?” Vol. 13: 365
(1988-89).
Gless, Alan G., “Appreciating the Changing Factual
Meaning of ‘Verbatim,’ or Battling the
Curse of the ‘Verbatim’ Assumption,” Vol. 25: 1 (2004).
Gould, Jon B., “Studying Inequality with One Eye: A New Agenda for Evaluating Disparate Treatment in the Courts,” Vol.
23: 317 (2003).
Hannaford-Agor, Paula, and Nicole Mott, “Research on
Self-Represented Litigation: Preliminary Results and Methodological Considerations,” Vol.
24: 163 (2003).
Hurwitz,
Mark S., Legal Note, “Judge
Lopez Torres and New York’s Trial Judge Nominating Process,” Vol. 28:
243 (2007).
Hurwitz,
Mark S., Legal Note, “Judges
and the Rule of Necessity: Ignacio
and the Ninth Circuit’s Judges,” Vol. 28: 241 (2007).
Kennedy, David M., and Mark H. Moore, “Underwriting
the Risky Investment in Community Policing: What
Social Science Should Be Doing to Evaluate Community Policing,” Vol.
17: 271
(1995).
Kress, Jack M., and Joseph C. Calpin, “Research Problems
Encountered in Moving Towards
Equity in Judicial Decision-Making,” Vol. 4: 71 (1978).
Molyneux, Robert, Review, “Government Documents and
Criminal Justice,” Vol. 1/1: 91
(1974).
Neubauer, David W., “Research Note:
A Polychotomous Measure of Appellate Court Outcomes: The Case of Criminal Appeals,” Vol.
16/1: 75 (1992).
Olson, Susan M., “Studying
Federal District Courts Through Published Cases: A Research Note,” Vol.
15: 782 (1992).
Rathjen, Gregory J., “The Role of Survey Research in the
Administration of Justice,” Vol. 22:
333 (2001).
Sever, Brion, Ronald L. Reisner, and Ryan S. King,
“Successfully Acquiring Data from Criminal
Courts: Is It What You Know, Who You
Know, or What You Don’t Tell
Them?” Vol. 22: 315 (2001).
Stentz, Steven, “Improving Weighted Caseload Studies in
Limited Jurisdiction Courts,” Vol.
13: 379 (1988-89).
Wasby, Stephen L., “Roundtable: An Agenda for Judicial Administration Research,”
Vol. 16/1: 1 (1992).
Index
|
