Caperton v. Massey in the media
Court Ties Campaign Largess to Judicial Bias
The Washington Post
June 9, 2009
Court: Judges must avoid appearance of bias
USA Today
June 9, 2009
High Court Says Judge Should Have Stepped Aside
NPR, Morning Edition
June 9, 2009
Justices Set New Standard for Recusals
The Wall Street Journal
June 9, 2009
Justices Tell Judges Not to Rule on Major Backers
The New York Times
June 8, 2009
Supreme Court issues landmark ruling on judicial recusal
The National Law Journal
June 8, 2009
Supreme Court says Benjamin should have recused himself
Charleston (W.Va.) Gazette
June 8, 2009
Benjamin’s replacement in Massey case not known
Charleston (W.Va.) Gazette
June 8, 2009
Supreme Court says judges can’t rule in cases involving own big donors
Los Angeles Times
June 9, 2009
W.Va. mining case could shape U.S. judicial races
The Charleston Gazette (Charleston, W.Va.)
March 1, 2009
Justice Not for Sale (Editorial)
The New York Times
March 2, 2009
Much-Watched Judicial Recusal Case Reaches Supreme Court
The National Law Journal
March 2, 2009
Supreme Court mulls judicial bias
USA Today
March 3, 2009
Justice for Sale? (Editorial)
The Washington Post
March 3, 2009
US High Court, In Judicial Bias Case, May Rule Against Massey Unit
Morningstar.com (Dow Jones article)
March 3, 2009
High Court Weighs Judicial Ethics
NPR, All Things Considered (Audio)
March 3, 2009
W.Va. Case Tests When Judges Should Step Aside
NPR, Morning Edition (Audio)
March 3, 2009
Supreme Court Justices Appear Ready to Set Recusal Rules
The National Law Journal
March 4, 2009
Justices struggle with standard to determine when due process requires recusal
The National Law Journal
March 4, 2009
Electing judges often results in a political taint (Editorial)
The Columbus Dispatch (Columbus, Ohio)
March 4, 2009
Supreme Court Oral Argument Transcript
March 3, 2009
|
